Skip to content

VMware Disk Provisioning Types: Complete Comparison and Best Practices

Published: at 06:36 PM

VMware Disk Provisioning Types: Complete Comparison Guide

When creating virtual machines in VMware environments, choosing the right disk provisioning type is crucial for optimizing storage efficiency, performance, and security. This guide provides a comprehensive comparison of the three main provisioning types available in VMware.

Overview of Disk Provisioning Types

VMware offers three primary disk provisioning options:

  1. Thin Provisioned
  2. Thick Provisioned, Lazily Zeroed
  3. Thick Provisioned, Eagerly Zeroed

Each type has distinct characteristics that make it suitable for different use cases and requirements.

Detailed Comparison Table

FeatureThin ProvisionedThick Provisioned, Lazily ZeroedThick Provisioned, Eagerly Zeroed
Storage Efficiency✅ Best (allocates space as needed)⚠️ Moderate (pre-allocates space but doesn’t zero out)❌ Worst (pre-allocates and zeroes out space)
Performance⚠️ Can slow down over time due to on-demand allocation👍 Better than thin, but slower on first write✅ Best, since all space is allocated and zeroed upfront
Security (Data Wiping)❌ No guarantee of old data being wiped⚠️ Old data remains until overwritten✅ Fully zeroed, ensuring no residual data
VM Creation Time✅ Fastest⚠️ Moderate❌ Slowest (due to zeroing)
Snapshot & Cloning Impact⚠️ Snapshots grow dynamically, consuming space over time👍 More predictable than thin👍 More predictable than thin
Disk Space Reclamation✅ Automatic space reclamation when files deleted❌ No automatic reclamation❌ No automatic reclamation
Storage Overcommit✅ Allows overcommitment of storage❌ Prevents overcommitment❌ Prevents overcommitment
I/O Overhead⚠️ Higher I/O overhead for new block allocation👍 Moderate I/O overhead✅ Minimal I/O overhead
vMotion Performance⚠️ May be slower due to sparse files👍 Good performance✅ Best performance

Thin Provisioned

How It Works

Advantages

Disadvantages

Best Use Cases

✅ Development and testing environments
✅ VDI deployments with many similar desktops
✅ Environments with limited storage
✅ Non-critical workloads
✅ Template VMs and rapid deployment scenarios

Thick Provisioned, Lazily Zeroed

How It Works

Advantages

Disadvantages

Best Use Cases

✅ Production environments with predictable storage needs
✅ Applications requiring consistent performance
✅ Environments where storage planning is critical
✅ Medium-performance database workloads
✅ Backup and archival systems

Thick Provisioned, Eagerly Zeroed

How It Works

Advantages

Disadvantages

Best Use Cases

✅ High-performance databases (Oracle, SQL Server, MySQL)
✅ Security-sensitive environments
✅ Mission-critical applications
✅ High-IOPS workloads
✅ VMware vSphere clusters (vMotion, HA)
✅ Environments requiring data compliance (HIPAA, PCI-DSS)
✅ Production email servers
✅ ERP systems

Decision Matrix

Choose Thin Provisioned when:

Choose Thick Provisioned (Lazily Zeroed) when:

Choose Thick Provisioned (Eagerly Zeroed) when:

Performance Impact Analysis

I/O Patterns Comparison

graph LR
    A[Write Request] --> B{Provisioning Type}
    B -->|Thin| C[Check Space Available]
    B -->|Lazy Zero| D[Zero Block on First Write]
    B -->|Eager Zero| E[Direct Write]

    C --> F[Allocate New Block]
    F --> G[Zero Block]
    G --> H[Write Data]

    D --> I[Write Data]
    E --> J[Write Data - Fastest]

    H --> K[Complete - Slowest]
    I --> L[Complete - Medium]
    J --> M[Complete - Fastest]

Performance Benchmarks (Typical Results)

OperationThin ProvisionedThick LazyThick Eager
VM Creation~1 minute~5 minutes~20 minutes
First BootNormalSlowerNormal
Sequential Write70-80% baseline85-90% baseline100% baseline
Random Write60-70% baseline80-85% baseline100% baseline
vMotion Time+20-30%+10-15%Baseline

Security Considerations

Data Remnant Analysis

Provisioning TypeData Security LevelCompliance Suitability
Thin⚠️ Low - Previous data may be accessible❌ Not suitable for sensitive data
Thick Lazy⚠️ Medium - Data cleared on first write⚠️ Limited compliance scenarios
Thick Eager✅ High - All blocks zeroed immediately✅ Suitable for all compliance requirements

Security Best Practices

  1. For Sensitive Data: Always use Thick Provisioned, Eagerly Zeroed
  2. Multi-tenant Environments: Avoid thin provisioning for security isolation
  3. Decommissioning: Proper disk wiping procedures regardless of provisioning type
  4. Encryption: Consider vSAN encryption or VM-level encryption for additional security

Storage Management Best Practices

Monitoring and Alerts

# PowerCLI script to monitor thin provisioned disks
Get-VM | Get-HardDisk | Where-Object {$_.StorageFormat -eq "Thin"} |
Select-Object Parent, Name, CapacityGB, @{N="UsedSpaceGB";E={[math]::Round($_.ExtensionData.Summary.Committed/1GB,2)}}

Capacity Planning

  1. Thin Provisioning: Monitor at 70% utilization, plan for 2-3x overcommit ratio
  2. Thick Provisioning: Standard 1:1 ratio, plan for growth
  3. Mixed Environments: Separate storage tiers for different provisioning types

Migration Strategies

# Convert thin to thick eager using PowerCLI
Get-VM "VMName" | Get-HardDisk | Set-HardDisk -StorageFormat EagerZeroedThick -Confirm:$false

Cost Analysis

Total Cost of Ownership Factors

FactorThinThick LazyThick Eager
Storage HardwareLowestMediumHighest
Performance ImpactMediumLowLowest
Management OverheadHighestMediumLowest
Backup StorageLowestMediumHighest

Conclusion and Recommendations

Best Overall Recommendation:

Enterprise Environment Strategy:

  1. Tier 1 Applications: Thick Eager
  2. Tier 2 Applications: Thick Lazy
  3. Development/Test: Thin Provisioned
  4. VDI: Thin Provisioned with linked clones
  5. Archive/Backup: Thick Lazy

The choice ultimately depends on your specific requirements for performance, security, storage efficiency, and budget constraints. Consider implementing a tiered approach using different provisioning types for different workload categories to optimize your VMware environment.