1010 words
5 minutes
VMware Disk Provisioning Types: Complete Comparison and Best Practices

VMware Disk Provisioning Types: Complete Comparison Guide#

When creating virtual machines in VMware environments, choosing the right disk provisioning type is crucial for optimizing storage efficiency, performance, and security. This guide provides a comprehensive comparison of the three main provisioning types available in VMware.

Overview of Disk Provisioning Types#

VMware offers three primary disk provisioning options:

  1. Thin Provisioned
  2. Thick Provisioned, Lazily Zeroed
  3. Thick Provisioned, Eagerly Zeroed

Each type has distinct characteristics that make it suitable for different use cases and requirements.

Detailed Comparison Table#

FeatureThin ProvisionedThick Provisioned, Lazily ZeroedThick Provisioned, Eagerly Zeroed
Storage Efficiency✅ Best (allocates space as needed)⚠️ Moderate (pre-allocates space but doesn’t zero out)❌ Worst (pre-allocates and zeroes out space)
Performance⚠️ Can slow down over time due to on-demand allocation👍 Better than thin, but slower on first write✅ Best, since all space is allocated and zeroed upfront
Security (Data Wiping)❌ No guarantee of old data being wiped⚠️ Old data remains until overwritten✅ Fully zeroed, ensuring no residual data
VM Creation Time✅ Fastest⚠️ Moderate❌ Slowest (due to zeroing)
Snapshot & Cloning Impact⚠️ Snapshots grow dynamically, consuming space over time👍 More predictable than thin👍 More predictable than thin
Disk Space Reclamation✅ Automatic space reclamation when files deleted❌ No automatic reclamation❌ No automatic reclamation
Storage Overcommit✅ Allows overcommitment of storage❌ Prevents overcommitment❌ Prevents overcommitment
I/O Overhead⚠️ Higher I/O overhead for new block allocation👍 Moderate I/O overhead✅ Minimal I/O overhead
vMotion Performance⚠️ May be slower due to sparse files👍 Good performance✅ Best performance

Thin Provisioned#

How It Works#

  • Allocates storage space on-demand as the guest OS writes data
  • Initially creates a small VMDK file that grows as needed
  • Returns unused space to the datastore when files are deleted (with proper tools)

Advantages#

  • Maximum storage efficiency - only uses space actually needed
  • Fast VM deployment - minimal initial storage allocation
  • Storage overcommitment - provision more VMs than physical storage
  • Automatic space reclamation - can return unused space

Disadvantages#

  • Performance degradation - slower performance as disk fills up
  • Storage monitoring required - risk of running out of space
  • Fragmentation - may lead to disk fragmentation over time
  • No data security - previous data may still exist on storage blocks

Best Use Cases#

✅ Development and testing environments
✅ VDI deployments with many similar desktops
✅ Environments with limited storage
✅ Non-critical workloads
✅ Template VMs and rapid deployment scenarios

Thick Provisioned, Lazily Zeroed#

How It Works#

  • Pre-allocates all storage space at VM creation time
  • Does not zero out the allocated blocks initially
  • Zeros blocks on first write by the guest OS

Advantages#

  • Predictable storage usage - known disk space consumption
  • Better performance than thin - no need for space allocation during writes
  • Good for capacity planning - clear storage requirements
  • Faster than eagerly zeroed - quicker VM creation

Disadvantages#

  • Storage inefficiency - allocates full disk space even if unused
  • First write penalty - slower performance on initial writes
  • No space reclamation - cannot return unused space
  • Security concerns - old data remains until overwritten

Best Use Cases#

✅ Production environments with predictable storage needs
✅ Applications requiring consistent performance
✅ Environments where storage planning is critical
✅ Medium-performance database workloads
✅ Backup and archival systems

Thick Provisioned, Eagerly Zeroed#

How It Works#

  • Pre-allocates all storage space at VM creation time
  • Immediately zeros out all allocated blocks
  • Provides the highest level of security and performance

Advantages#

  • Best performance - no allocation or zeroing overhead during runtime
  • Maximum security - all blocks are zeroed, eliminating data remnants
  • Predictable behavior - consistent performance characteristics
  • Compliance friendly - meets strict security requirements
  • Optimal for clustering - best choice for clustered environments

Disadvantages#

  • Longest creation time - significant time to zero all blocks
  • Storage inefficiency - uses full allocated space immediately
  • No flexibility - cannot overcommit storage
  • Resource intensive - high I/O during creation process

Best Use Cases#

✅ High-performance databases (Oracle, SQL Server, MySQL)
✅ Security-sensitive environments
✅ Mission-critical applications
✅ High-IOPS workloads
✅ VMware vSphere clusters (vMotion, HA)
✅ Environments requiring data compliance (HIPAA, PCI-DSS)
✅ Production email servers
✅ ERP systems

Decision Matrix#

Choose Thin Provisioned when:#

  • Storage efficiency is the primary concern
  • Working with development/test environments
  • Need to maximize VM density
  • Storage budget is constrained
  • Performance requirements are flexible

Choose Thick Provisioned (Lazily Zeroed) when:#

  • Need predictable storage usage
  • Performance is important but not critical
  • Want faster VM creation than eagerly zeroed
  • Don’t need the highest security level
  • Working with standard production workloads

Choose Thick Provisioned (Eagerly Zeroed) when:#

  • Performance is the top priority
  • Security requirements are strict
  • Working with mission-critical applications
  • Need compliance with data security standards
  • Budget allows for premium storage usage
  • Using VMware clustering features extensively

Performance Impact Analysis#

I/O Patterns Comparison#

graph LR
A[Write Request] --> B{Provisioning Type}
B -->|Thin| C[Check Space Available]
B -->|Lazy Zero| D[Zero Block on First Write]
B -->|Eager Zero| E[Direct Write]
C --> F[Allocate New Block]
F --> G[Zero Block]
G --> H[Write Data]
D --> I[Write Data]
E --> J[Write Data - Fastest]
H --> K[Complete - Slowest]
I --> L[Complete - Medium]
J --> M[Complete - Fastest]

Performance Benchmarks (Typical Results)#

OperationThin ProvisionedThick LazyThick Eager
VM Creation~1 minute~5 minutes~20 minutes
First BootNormalSlowerNormal
Sequential Write70-80% baseline85-90% baseline100% baseline
Random Write60-70% baseline80-85% baseline100% baseline
vMotion Time+20-30%+10-15%Baseline

Security Considerations#

Data Remnant Analysis#

Provisioning TypeData Security LevelCompliance Suitability
Thin⚠️ Low - Previous data may be accessible❌ Not suitable for sensitive data
Thick Lazy⚠️ Medium - Data cleared on first write⚠️ Limited compliance scenarios
Thick Eager✅ High - All blocks zeroed immediately✅ Suitable for all compliance requirements

Security Best Practices#

  1. For Sensitive Data: Always use Thick Provisioned, Eagerly Zeroed
  2. Multi-tenant Environments: Avoid thin provisioning for security isolation
  3. Decommissioning: Proper disk wiping procedures regardless of provisioning type
  4. Encryption: Consider vSAN encryption or VM-level encryption for additional security

Storage Management Best Practices#

Monitoring and Alerts#

Terminal window
# PowerCLI script to monitor thin provisioned disks
Get-VM | Get-HardDisk | Where-Object {$_.StorageFormat -eq "Thin"} |
Select-Object Parent, Name, CapacityGB, @{N="UsedSpaceGB";E={[math]::Round($_.ExtensionData.Summary.Committed/1GB,2)}}

Capacity Planning#

  1. Thin Provisioning: Monitor at 70% utilization, plan for 2-3x overcommit ratio
  2. Thick Provisioning: Standard 1:1 ratio, plan for growth
  3. Mixed Environments: Separate storage tiers for different provisioning types

Migration Strategies#

Terminal window
# Convert thin to thick eager using PowerCLI
Get-VM "VMName" | Get-HardDisk | Set-HardDisk -StorageFormat EagerZeroedThick -Confirm:$false

Cost Analysis#

Total Cost of Ownership Factors#

FactorThinThick LazyThick Eager
Storage HardwareLowestMediumHighest
Performance ImpactMediumLowLowest
Management OverheadHighestMediumLowest
Backup StorageLowestMediumHighest

Conclusion and Recommendations#

Best Overall Recommendation:#

  • If you need maximum performance and have adequate storageThick Provisioned (Eagerly Zeroed)
  • If you want a balance of performance and space efficiencyThick Provisioned (Lazily Zeroed)
  • If storage efficiency is critical and performance is flexibleThin Provisioned

Enterprise Environment Strategy:#

  1. Tier 1 Applications: Thick Eager
  2. Tier 2 Applications: Thick Lazy
  3. Development/Test: Thin Provisioned
  4. VDI: Thin Provisioned with linked clones
  5. Archive/Backup: Thick Lazy

The choice ultimately depends on your specific requirements for performance, security, storage efficiency, and budget constraints. Consider implementing a tiered approach using different provisioning types for different workload categories to optimize your VMware environment.

VMware Disk Provisioning Types: Complete Comparison and Best Practices
https://mranv.pages.dev/posts/vmware-disk-provisioning-comparison/
Author
Anubhav Gain
Published at
2025-03-01
License
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0